1 Introduction

Mozart provides support for distributed programming. This document describes how distribution is realized and what features Mozart offers to deal with distribution. Guidance on how to practically do distributed programming can be found in the ``Distributed Programming in Mozart - A Tutorial Introduction''.

Distribution is realized by a Distribution Subsystem (DS) used by the Mozart process. The DS implements a state-of-the-art middleware abstracting away the network from higher levels. This is achieved by defining entity consistency protocols that maintain the semantics of local Oz-entities also when distributed. Messages in these protocols are reliably delivered disregarding, transient network congestion and partitions.

Communication with an arbitrary number of sites1

Through a 128 bit unique-id schema, billions of remote machines can be addressed. By letting connections time-share the usage of physical channels when there is a lack of resources, the DS is able to handle thousands of simultaneous connections even on off-the-shelf hardware.

Modular design allows customization

The DS has a layered and modular design enabling additions of new transport protocols. The DS currently uses TCP, but work is being done to add a lean reliable UDP implementation and a shared memory communication schema.

Platform Independent

The implementation of the DS is mature, stable, and available on multiple platforms. Currently, versions for Linux, Windows and many flavours of Unix exist. The protocols used for transferring data are platform independent, enabling inter-platform communication.

Serialization of the language graph

An advanced marshaler is available to serialize language graphs to be fit in messages. During marshaling the different types of entities are treated separately to allow replication of stateless entities, and distribution of references to stateful ones. An unmarshaler is able to build a corresponding language graph at the receiver side, replacing remote entity references with proxy structures.

Reliable message delivery and fault tolerant

The DS ensures reliable delivery of messages even in the case of transient faults. By use of an acknowledge schema, transient faults can be recovered.

High throughput with an efficient implementation

By clever usage of pipelining in bounded memory, together with priority based message sending, the overhead imposed by the complexity of the DS makes the communication only slightly slower than over a raw socket implemented in C.

1.1 Layered Design

The DS is responsible for opening and closing connections, transferring messages, reporting network problems and executing the consistency protocols attached to all distributed entities. This is implemented by a three-layered structure (see Figure 1.1) with the three layers Protocol Layer, Communication Layer and Transport Layer. The topmost layer, the Protocol Layer, is responsible for running the protocols that the DS implements. The middle layer, the Communication Layer, handles virtual channels that are created between different processes. The lowest layer, the Transport Layer, implements an interface to any transport protocol used to transfer messages between machines. The Communication Layer and the Transport Layer together are also referred to as the Message Passing Layer. A more detailed description of this design can be found in Anna Neiderud's master's thesis report.


Figure 1.1: The Mozart Virtual machine and the Distribution Subsystem


1.2 Outline

The remainder of this document describes some major parts of the DS and their implementation. Chapter 2 explains the bootstrapping sequence for connections and how connection establishment can be customized. Chapter 3 then discusses how entities of Mozart are distributed. After that Chapter 4 shows how the implementation has been made efficient. A challenging question in distributed programming is failure, and how to deal with it is discussed in Chapter 5. Chapter 6 and Chapter 7 give useful pointers to understanding and using all the features described.


1. Every Mozart process is referred to as a site.

Erik Klintskog and Anna Neiderud
Version 1.4.0 (20080702)